Is it possible to cut children under one year of age: signs and superstitions

Oh, and life is hard for superstitious people who have recently become parents. Sit, remember where to put the water after bathing the baby, where to hang the diapers washed in the evening, how to get around the mirror and so on. Young mothers and fathers attach particular importance to the hair of a child. And here and the grandmothers are tightened. A direct sacred sect of infant hair is obtained.

So, we are discussing whether it is possible to cut children up to a year. Signs and superstitions are also analyzed.

Will not speak

One of the beliefs of antiquity says that you can not cut a child up to a year. Say symbolically cut the baby’s tongue, it means it will start to speak very late.

However, vague doubts torment. The kid will start talking early if he is constantly engaged. Of course, not full-time occupations, after all, an infant. But the nursery rhymes, rhymes, short tales will be very out of place. Anyway, ordinary conversation gives the child more opportunities for development. For mothers who don’t speak with their children, they begin to talk by the age of 3. What does it mean to have an early haircut if the parents don’t communicate with a tiny voice?

My child, at 1 year and 5 months old, was chattering ditties and was talking pretty well. Although sheared it at zero at 6 months, it was painfully shaggy. Hair interfered, climbed into the eyes, ears, tangled in the fingers. And all because all-day father-in-law chatted with him. He did not fall silent for a minute. Songs, ditties, poems, tales, jokes. It happened that like an akyn: what I see is what I sing. And the haircut did not affect.

Interesting. There are many signs that require prohibitions on most actions with the baby. And some of them are somehow related to speech. Remember that to a greater extent, everything depends on the parents themselves and the environment of the child. But not from "one grandmother said" or "great-grandmother gave me a belief."

Scared a lot

And you can carefully trim the child with good hairdressing scissors. If at the same time distract the baby, not shout, but amuse him, then most likely the haircut will pass completely imperceptibly. The choice is yours.

Interesting. The child will much easier to carry the first haircut, if you arrange everything in the form of a game. Just do not need now about "he still does not understand." Maybe he doesn’t understand. But this does not give parents the right to neglect the baby.

Grow unhealthy

The following superstition says that you can’t cut a child under one year old because you cut off your health. Sorry, this is some obscurantism. Well, yes, that's just an early haircut and steal infant health. And the fact that hygiene, proper feeding, psychological development and other aspects are more crucial, all this is not taken into account.

After all, the main thing is not to cut! Now let's look from the other side. Situation:

• summer
• heat
• your child has long hair

Compare these three points, what do we have in the end? Correctly. Sweating, irritation, spots on delicate skin, whimpering and capricious child. Hey mummies, what do you choose? Will I accept or health of my child?

Or another option. A long bang has grown, creeping into my eyes.Well, is it really impossible to cut her hair to stop spoiling the baby’s vision? Or do you need to strictly wait for the achievement of the year, and let the baby suffer?

Interesting. Ask any priest in the Christian church. And each of them will say that it is possible to cut a child up to a year if the hairs cause discomfort to the child or threaten their health.

Poverty Torment

Rumor has it that you can’t cut a child up to a year, because the poor will grow up. Yes Yes. Our people are used to blaming anyone and anything, but not themselves.

Sorry, the causal link between “early haircut” and “poverty” is not lining up. Wealth comes to the smart and hardworking. Sometimes evil and cunning. And who knows which of the current millionaires still not trimmed to a year?

Interesting. There was not a single large-scale study on the relationship of infant haircuts up to a year and subsequent well-being. Independent experts also refuse to conduct such experiments. The thing is that too many influencing factors will have to be considered. And this is too expensive a study that does not give any practical results.

Hair will be bad

What else does folk wisdom threaten us with? She categorically forbids cutting a child up to a year, because hair will grow poorly. And in order for the child to amaze everyone with a chic mane in the future, the ritual of shearing the infant gun should be carried out strictly at the age of 1 year.

There is a certain rational grain in this. Because if you carelessly cut a baby, for example, with a machine or, God forbid, with a razor, you can damage the hair follicles. The fact is that they are still very close to the surface of the skin. Therefore, if you already decided to mow a child up to a year, then do it very carefully.

Interesting. Did you know that no type of haircut at any age affects the quantity, thickness and thickness of hair. What mom and dad inherited, then on the head and grow up. Infant haircut nothing to do with. Her Majesty Genetics is the defendant for the hair and her condition.

Is it possible to cut children up to a year: signs and superstitions are chosen by each parents for themselves. If the hairs interfere with the baby, then stop listening to the grandmother's tales and cut her hair. What is the child tormented by?

If the child lives quietly with long curls, they do not bother him, then do not disturb him again with his hairdressing troubles. Let the hair be.

Video: first baby haircut